Who * strong four mainstream reading software cross-evaluation comparison
From the Internet to buy a book to the handacter reading, now our reading habits have already changed the earth-shaking change, and the mobile phone reading has become a trend, and it has been deeply in our lives. But in the face of a wide variety of mobile phone reading software, you will not be confused? So in the end, who is reading the experience * Is it good? Today, we will be a prestigious novel, read , QQ reading and reading the four reading software for comparison evaluation, see who is a good software to read the book on the phone.
In order to ensure the accuracy of the test, we have tested in the same scenario under the same scene, the test model is Smartisan M1L, and the system version is Android 6.0.1.
System power consumption test
When using a mobile phone reading, in addition to the novel resources, the user * cares must be the power consumption of this reading, because No one is willing to look at the book, the phone suddenly has no electricity. Therefore, we first evaluated the system power consumption of these four mobile phone reading software in the reading scenario. We will see which mobile phone reading software is large at a time limit. In order to ensure accurate evaluation, after each reading software test, we will charge the mobile phone power to the next software.
We all from 100 % Of the power consumption, measure the consumption of four mobile phone reading software in the reading interface
Contrast I found that the four mobile phone reading software is the most excellent performance, reading only after an hour after reading 8% power consumption. The performance of reading and qq reading is also a rule in the middle, and the two software consumes 11%, but it is not so far, consuming 16%, power consumption *. In this regard, integrated ranking novels \u0026 gt; read \u003d QQ reading \u0026 gt; read more.
When using mobile phone reading, the speed of opening software and books is also very important for reading software, because there is no user is willing to read the book. Waiting for half a day, I don't think about it, so the start speed is also a point when each user chooses to read software. Therefore, we tested the speed of these four mobile phone reading software, and the start speed of these four software and the speed of the reading module were opened under the same scene. In order to test accurate, each of our software has tested 10 times, and recorded the time using professional software, and finally taking the average time.
It can be seen by testing that in terms of start-up speed, the performance of the flag novel is still a circle.It is possible to say that both software startup time or open books in the same network environment * fast. At the same time, I read more about reading this aspect to pull back a city. In terms of speed and book flag novels, the QQ reading is the third, and the palm is ignorant, the speed and open book speed *slow. Integrated rankings in the starting speed.
It is well known that although the e-book is popular, everyone still misses the reading feeling of paper books, so, whether from reading or turning from reading It feels that the more you can get the user's favorite information. Then, if you want to get a paper book-like page and reading experience on your mobile phone, the rendering ability of mobile phone reading software is very important. So, let's take a look at the rendering capabilities and effects of these four mobile phone reading software.
Book flag novels are the most smooth, * like paper books
Although the QQ reading supports flipping effects similar to paper books, it is not very Smooth 
Read more to read the floppage mode
From the test, it can be seen in these four mobile phones In the reading software, whether it is from page pages or speed, the applause and the book flag novel are obviously more smooth. After reviewing the reason, it was found that the book flag novels and appreciation used OpenGL technology to make graphic rendering for flopping action, so that these two apps can make full use of mobile GPUs to speed up hardware, so that the page is more smooth and smooth. The content of the novel is also more natural, and the reading experience is significantly improved, allowing users to get a more similar paper reading experience. In contrast, QQ reading and more reading because there is no use of OpenGL rendering technology, turn the page effect is not as good as the book flag novels and appointments, and the reading experience needs to be improved.
In addition, we evaluate the good and bad software, but also judges from the perspective of interface layout, page rendering and user experience, for reading This is the case, and the interface and operation are always compared at the same time, so we also test the page experience of these four reading software.
阅 书架 and reading page
[ 123] 
From the above comparison chart, you can see that the page of these four reading software is similar, the icon size is moderate, the bottom bar function button Classification is clear, the window page is more intuitive, the reading page experience is also very smooth, and it is good to drag. It can be seen that the experience of these four well-known reading software is in the industry * echelon, reading experience is more good, what exactly what you think is better, just see you.
From the various data of the evaluation, the performance of the book flag novel is most excellent, whether in power consumption, or Both start speeds are superior or flat. At the same time, according to our professional test, the collapse rate of the book flag novel is only one thousandth, and the security vulnerability is less than the competition, and the various indicators have reached the top level of the industry, and the other three reading software have thousands of autumn. As the saying goes, there will be development. Under benign competition, we hope that well-known reading software on these markets will continue to bring us surprises, let \"books\" read more convenient. 